< Back to latest news & events

Retail Scanner

Marketplaces and counterfeit goods

October 2017

What are retailers doing about it? The topic of online marketplaces and counterfeit goods is nothing new, but what are retailers doing about it? This is a brief overview on the recent developments of how one retailer in particular is stepping up its game and attempting to tackle online sales of counterfeit goods.

Some background

Amazon Marketplace opened its online doors in 2000 and allows third party retailers to sell their goods through Amazon and use various Amazon services if they wish. The online marketplace has been hugely successful and currently, the sellers on Amazon Marketplace are shipping as many goods as Amazon itself. It is through these third party sellers where counterfeit goods can sneak into the system, often undetected.

Amazon has a complicated inventory system in some warehouses, known as commingling, where products from Amazon and third party sellers are mixed-up together, so it is difficult to ascertain where the fake product originated. The mix up happens when sellers use Amazon’s order fulfilment service as products will all share the same barcode, regardless of seller. This happens so Amazon can dispatch a product from the nearest warehouse to the customer. But when this happens, who is liable for the counterfeit product?

In a joint lawsuit with Fitness Anywhere LLC (TRX), Amazon filed an infringement claim against a group of sellers, selling counterfeit TRX fitness equipment. Good news for Fitness Anywhere as they were awarded $6.8million in damages. However, it is unlikely that Amazon will be able to litigate away every single counterfeiter. The best they can realistically hope for is to deter some sellers.

In December 2016, Allstar Marketing Group LLC sued Amazon for trade mark infringement, claiming that they had enabled the importation and sale of an ‘astronomical number’ of counterfeit Snuggie blanket products. Suing Amazon is not a new thing, but Allstar have claimed that Amazon knew about the infringing goods and continued to import them regardless despite the opportunity to intervene. The dispute continues.

Moving forward

Amazon already has a handful of anti-counterfeiting measures, including reporting tools for sellers but reviews of how effective this tool is, are very mixed. Recently, Amazon has made it harder for unauthorised sellers to list items by requiring third-party merchants to pay a fee for listing top brands like Nike or Hasbro and they have to prove they got the inventory from the manufacturer or an authorised distributor.

Fighting back

More recently, Amazon has updated their Brand Registry feature for Marketplace sellers within their Brand Central digital suite which means companies can list their trade marks, including logos, which would enable Amazon to remove listings and even seller accounts which are caught selling fake goods.

In addition, Amazon is offering another new program called ‘Transparency’ which enables sellers to label packages with a unique code, so customers can cross check their purchases against official information. This provides customers with details about where a product comes from, including manufacturing date, location and other details like materials and ingredients.

Both tools have been well received by retailers so far.

Latest updates

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

HGF ranked highly recommended in the WIPR Trade Mark Rankings 2025

HGF has been recognised as a leading firm in the recently published World IP Review (WIPR) Trade Mark Rankings 2025. This achievement highlights our continued commitment to excellence in trade …

Read article

T1977/22: Can claims defined by open-ended ranges ever be sufficiently disclosed?

The EPO’s Board of Appeal’s decision in T1977/22 provides an interesting review of the case law concerning the compatibility of whole range sufficiency and claims defined as a result to …

Read article

The draft of The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025 reveals practical details on how to obtain a Precision Bred Organism status

In a recent blog post we discussed the Precision Breeding Regulatory Framework developed by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). Further details on the application process for Precision Bred Organism confirmation …

Read article

A £2.1M Lesson: The Power of Confidential Information

A recent High Court ruling1 serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respecting confidential business information. Hambro Perks, was found guilty of breaching confidentiality and ordered to pay …

Read article
Event - 6th March 2025

IQPC Global IP Exchange Europe 2025

HGF is sponsoring the IQPC Global IP Exchange Europe, which will be held on the 11th-12th March 2025 in Meliá, Berlin. Head of Electronics, Chris Benson, will be chairing the …

Event details

IP Ingredients: Pouring Over the Verdict: What Thatchers v Aldi Means for Food & Drink Brands

Readers of our IP Ingredients blog may recall that we covered something of this case last summer in our post IP Ingredients: Summer case law review. The dispute between Thatchers …

Read article