Mr Mrs Miss Ms Dr Other

Dr
Patrick
Clarke

Partner & Patent Attorney

York Office

Technology & Engineering

Telephone. +44(0) 1904 732 120
Email. pclarke@hgf.com
UPC Representative
Our team of specialist European patent litigators, oppositions specialists and patent attorneys bring together an extensive depth of legal and technical knowledge and are qualified to represent you in the UPC.
Vcard
Linkedin

Experience

Patrick specialises in the drafting and prosecution of telecommunications and consumer electronics patent applications and has a particular interest in standard-related applications, such as those directed towards the 3GPP family of standards, including 4G and 5G technologies. Patrick also has extensive experience at hearings before the UK IPO and Oral Proceedings before the Examining Division at the EPO.

Specialisms

Services

Qualifications

Patent Attorney

Chartered (UK)
Europe

MENG

Electronic Engineering

PHD

Electronic Engineering

POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA OR CERTIFICATE

Intellectual Property

Publications

PRESS RELEASE: HGF Announces Promotion of Nine New Partners Following CBPE Investment

View publication online

Related News

Office Closed Dates December 2025 / January 2026

HGF Office Closed Dates December 2025 / January 2026   UK Thursday 25 and Friday 26 December 2025 CLOSED Thursday 1 January 2026* CLOSED * Friday 2 January 2026 – …

Read article

PRESS RELEASE – HGF strengthens European presence with three new Partners in France and Germany

HGF is pleased to announce the arrival of three new partners, further strengthening its European presence. Two partners will be joining the firm’s fast-growing French practice, and one will join …

Read article

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

The Antibody Series #5 | Epitope-defined antibody claims: when “binds to this epitope” becomes a risk of insufficiency

The Boards of Appeal of the EPO (BoA) are the appeal body that reviews decisions made at the EPO; here, they reviewed an appeal in opposition proceedings after the revocation …

Read article

The Deity Shoes case: a question of design activity and the constraints on a designer’s freedom

The footwear brand Deity Shoes sought to enforce their Community Design rights, both registered and unregistered, against Mundorama Confort and Stay Design. However, Mundorama Confort and Stay Design found fault …

Read article

The Antibody Series #4 | pH points in antibody claims: when “same pH ” becomes an addition of matter

The Boards of Appeal of the EPO (BoA) are the appeal body that reviews EPO decisions; in this case, they reviewed a revocation in opposition of a patent relating to …

Read article

The Antibody Series #3 | Antibody code names in claims: why “ACZ885” is not sufficient to define the antibody

The Boards of Appeal of the EPO (BoA) are the appeal body that reviews EPO decisions. In this case, they examined a claim that identified an antibody by an internal …

Read article
See all updates

Let's talk

If you would like to discuss how HGF could help you, contact one of our IP specialists.

Contact us