< Back to latest news & events

News

Recording transactions at the EPO: New practice for signatures on evidence

March 2024

From 1 April 2024, the EPO will accept digital or text string signatures as alternatives to handwritten or facsimile signatures on contracts and declarations submitted as evidence to support requests for registrations of transfers and licenses.

Furthermore, provided the position of the signatory who is entitled to sign is expressly indicated in the supporting evidence, that entitlement to sign will no longer be checked by the EPO.

These changes will simplify the registration process for applicants and are more aligned to many other major jurisdictions and IP offices already accepting electronic signatures on assignments and licences, so supporting evidence can be used more consistently.  The new rules will also apply to transactions concerning Unitary Patents (registered at the EPO).

Background

The new Notice from the EPO, when it comes into force on 1 April 2024, sets out that:

“ With a view to simplifying its procedures and promoting digital transformation, the European Patent Office (EPO) will accept a broader range of electronic signatures on documents submitted as evidence to support requests under Rules 22 and 85 and under Rules 23 and 24 EPC. In line with the signature requirements in the patent grant process, the EPO will accept handwritten signatures, facsimile signatures, and text string signatures within the meaning of Article 12(2) and (3) of the decision by the President of the European Patent Office dated 3 May 2023 concerning the electronic filing of documents. Documents bearing a facsimile signature or a text string signature may be filed either on paper or electronically using the EPO’s electronic filing services.”

The EPO Notice says it will accept digital signatures that use Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) technology, including advanced and qualified electronic signatures within the meaning of the EU’s eIDAS Regulation.  It will also accept digital signatures that do not use PKI technology provided that:

  • the documents in question are filed electronically;
  • are legible; and
  • are not infected with a computer virus and do not contain other malicious software.

The EPO says it will not examine the authenticity of the signature applied to a document. However, where any doubts over its authenticity arise, the EPO will require clarification and may request further evidence.

Entitlement to sign

A further simplification of EPO practice concerns examination of an individual’s entitlement to sign on behalf of a legal person in respect of registration of assignments and licences.  Where a person is entitled to sign by virtue of their position within the legal person, this position needs to be expressly indicated.  However, the entitlement will no longer be checked by the EPO.  Best practice is sill to confirm the individual signing has authority to sign and then include the specific role/position of that person in the signature block of the assignment/licence that is to be recorded at the EPO.

It should be noted that these rule changes are only applicable to the recordal of transactions at the EPO and a successful recordal does not necessarily mean that the underlying assignment or license is valid. For example, it’s still imperative that a signatory has the appropriate authority to sign on behalf of a relevant party and whether or not an electronic signature is sufficient to provide a binding contract will depend on the laws governing the contract at the time.

If you would like further advice on this change in EPO practice, please speak to your usual attorney.

Latest updates

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

Designation of a technical standard as a trademark

EUTMR Article 7 (1) (c) and Article 7 (1) (b) – DASH The designation “DASH” of the technical standard/protocol/format for streaming data on the Internet constitutes a descriptive indication in …

Read article

HGF ranked band 4 in Chambers and Partners Global Guide for Germany in 2025

Chambers and Partners Global Guide 2025 is now live. HGF is proud to be ranked as a firm in Germany. HGF is ranked band 4 for: Germany: Intellectual Property: Patent …

Read article

HGF ranked in The Legal 500 Germany 2025

HGF is proud to be ranked in The Legal 500 Germany 2025 guide. The Legal 500 provides the most comprehensive worldwide coverage on recommended Law firms, Lawyers, Attorneys, Advocates, Solicitors, …

Read article

T 1847/22: Procedural considerations in appeal: Re-ordering of requests and the impact on admissibility

Background This case concerned EP 3 085 344 B1, which relates to a wound pad, a self-adhesive member comprising a wound pad. The patent was opposed by two opponents. During …

Read article

Regulation of NGT plants in Europe- Polish Presidency proposes an alternative solution to the Patent ban

In the latest development on the new proposed legislation for the regulation of NGT (gene-edited) plants in the EU, the Polish Presidency have proposed an amendment which removes the proposed …

Read article
Event - 18th March 2025

Salzburg Seminar: Pitfalls in trade mark practice - What can be protected as a trade mark?

The registration of trade marks is a central component of trade mark protection – but which signs can actually be protected? In recent years, the national trade mark offices and …

Event details