< Back to latest news & events

News

Alright Cuthbert

May 2023

The caterpillar war may have been settled last year, but it hasn’t stopped Aldi continuing to dig at M&S.

There was the limited edition Cuthbert being sold to raise money for cancer charities, Aldi’s 2021 Christmas advert (A Christmas Carrot) opening with Cuthbert being arrested by two lemon police officer and in 2022 (A Feast of Football) Kevin the Carrot watching a football match with the teams being ‘Cuth’ v ‘Col’.

Then there were the #CuthBack vans in the summer last year, parking outside M&S Stores in a number of cities, including London and Manchester:

It is fair to say that Aldi’s PR team have come out on top in the court of public opinion and using social media to its full advantage.

Aldi have this week reignited the rivalry, with a new advert comparing the prices of various supermarket caterpillar shaped cakes, with a scuffle with Colin and follow up posts and interviews.

Whilst the last segment from the ongoing social media saga is amusing, why else are we commenting on the advert? Comparative advertising!

There are a number of rules surrounding the dos and don’ts of comparative advertising if a competitor’s products are identified in an advert. From a trade mark perspective, if a brand uses a competitor’s product to advertise its own products, there is a risk of trade mark infringement.

As such, to be compliant, a comparative advert must not be misleading, compare the same goods, not take unfair advantage and not cause confusion. The advert is clear on the comparisons being made on a like for like basis and consumers are given sufficient information to know the comparisons being made.

However, comparative adverts should also not discredit or denigrate competitors. Whether the advert falls short in this respect remains to be seen (although am looking forward to the next advert!).

M&S do not appear to have responded to the advert, although they have released a limited edition Coronation Colin, so look out for those!

 


This article was written by Trade Mark Director Claire Jones.

Latest updates

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

WIPR Diversity Top 100 2025

HGF’s European Patent Attorney Alexandra Wood has been listed in World IP Review’s (WIPR) Diversity Top 100 2025 World IP Review’s Diversity in IP listings 2025 recognises and celebrates people …

Read article

INTA 2025 Annual Meeting Live

The HGF European team will be attending the INTA Annual Meeting Live, which will take place on 17th-21st May in San Diego, US. The conference will connect some of the …

Read article

HGF wins big at the Managing IP EMEA Awards Ceremony 2025

The Annual Managing IP Awards: EMEA Awards 2025 were announced last night, and HGF are proud to have won 7 awards. The Managing IP Awards are highly recognised and respected …

Read article

Plant Patent Infringement in the US Relies on Evidence of Asexual Reproduction

A recent case in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division) once again highlights how important the initial pleadings and evidence in patent infringement cases …

Read article

Exam Success at HGF!

HGF is pleased to announce that several of our attorneys have passed their UK Advanced Patent exams! In no specific order, we would like to say well done and a …

Read article

IP Ingredients: How food companies are using IP to stay ahead of the GLP-1 curve

The impact of GLP-1 on the food and beverage sector GLP-1 agonists, best-known under the brand names Ozempic® and Wegovy®, are medicines used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity. …

Read article