< Back to latest news & events

Knowledge Hub

UK ratifies the Unified Patent Court Agreement

May 2018

On World IP day last week, the UK Minister for Intellectual Property, Sam Gyimah MP, confirmed that the UK has ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA).  The announcement from UKIPO can be read here.   Simultaneously, the UK also deposited its formal instrument of ratification, making 16 countries in total having ratified the UPCA.

The news was welcomed by CIPA and received a positive reception from the UPC preparatory team.  However, they also acknowledged that “There remains more work to do before the provisional application phase can commence – not least the outcome of the complaint against the UPCA in Germany which will influence the speed of moving to the final stage of the project.”

The complaint referred to is a case currently pending in the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) concerning the law passed by the German Parliament on the implementation of the UPCA, which has put German ratification is on hold until this is resolved.  But technically, once Germany ratify and deposit their instrument of ratification the UP system can come into effect after a Provisional Application Phase.  The Provisional Application Phase itself can come into force the day after France, Germany, the UK and 10 other states have signed (or confirmed that they have parliamentary approval to ratify) the UPCA and have consented to be bound by the PPA; to date 12 states have signed up.

Enough countries have now ratified the UPC agreement so that the UP and UPC systems can come into effect if Germany completes its own ratification procedures and sufficient approvals to the PPA are obtained, Brexit permitting.

What about Brexit ?

The UKIPO announcement calls the Agreement on the UPC an international treaty, explaining that the international court will have jurisdiction over patent disputes across its contracting states.  While this is true, it does not address the fact that at present, participants to the Agreement must be members of the EU and that the Court will be subject to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).   Nothing has been published in respect of the UPC and Brexit negotiations – the Draft Agreement for the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union  published in March this year set out a transitional period for certain IP rights – with the UK set to remain part of the European Union design and trade mark systems until the end of a transition period on 31 December 2020 – but was silent on the UP and UPC.  Without such a transitional period the UK will no longer be an EU member state from 29 March 2019 and the status of the UK for the UP and UPC agreements is currently unclear.  Completing ratification in Germany, and allowing for the provisional application phase all before 29 March 2019 seems very ambitious, but the UP and UPC has surprised us before and may do so again.

Latest updates

A New Era for AI Patents in the UK: Supreme Court Aligns with the EPO

The UK Supreme Court has handed down its long-awaited judgment in Emotional Perception AI Limited (EPAI) vs Comptroller General of Patents, a decision which serves to significantly change the way …

Read article
Event - 23rd - 25th March 2026

HGF are Gold Sponsors of IPBC Europe 2026

HGF are proud sponsors of IPBC Europe 2026, taking place from 23-25 March 2026 at the Pullman Paris Montparnasse. Bringing together patent pioneers, in-house leaders and private practice specialists, IPBC …

Event details
Event - 8th - 11th February 2026

AUTM Meeting 2026

We are attending the AUTM Annual Meeting from 8–11 February, a flagship event bringing together technology transfer professionals from across the globe. AUTM connects innovators, universities, and industry leaders to …

Event details

The Antibody Series #5 | Epitope-defined antibody claims: when “binds to this epitope” becomes a risk of insufficiency

The Boards of Appeal of the EPO (BoA) are the appeal body that reviews decisions made at the EPO; here, they reviewed an appeal in opposition proceedings after the revocation …

Read article

The Deity Shoes case: a question of design activity and the constraints on a designer’s freedom

The footwear brand Deity Shoes sought to enforce their Community Design rights, both registered and unregistered, against Mundorama Confort and Stay Design. However, Mundorama Confort and Stay Design found fault …

Read article

The Antibody Series #4 | pH points in antibody claims: when “same pH ” becomes an addition of matter

The Boards of Appeal of the EPO (BoA) are the appeal body that reviews EPO decisions; in this case, they reviewed a revocation in opposition of a patent relating to …

Read article

The Antibody Series #3 | Antibody code names in claims: why “ACZ885” is not sufficient to define the antibody

The Boards of Appeal of the EPO (BoA) are the appeal body that reviews EPO decisions. In this case, they examined a claim that identified an antibody by an internal …

Read article
Event - 3rd February 2026

HGF Brand & Design Conference 2026

Join us on 3rd February 2026 for HGF’s Brand & Design Conference, the must attend event for in-house legal teams, brand leaders, creatives, and innovators shaping the future of IP. …

Event details