< Back to latest news & events

UPC

Unitary Patent Renewal Fees – proposed figures revealed

March 2015

Ever since the prospect of a Unitary Patent for Europe became a reality, the subject of cost has been hotly debated. Will a Unitary Patent save me money? But with so many unknowns, the question has been like a puzzle.

According to various sources, we could have the first piece in the puzzle, with the EPO having made a proposal on the level of renewal fees. In a document “Proposals for the level of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect”, (which we’ve yet to see a copy of) submitted by the President of the EPO to the Select Committee of the Administrative Council for their opinion, the EPO has come up with the following proposal:

To meet the requirements set out in Article 12 of the Regulation on the Unitary Patent, the EPO has allegedly proposed the following structure for setting unitary patent renewal fees:

  • years 3 to 5: the level of the EPO’s internal renewal fees (IRF) [these are the fees payable to the EPO for pending patent applications currently]
  • years 6 to 9: a transitional level between the IRF level and the year 10 level
  • from year 10, a level equivalent to the total sum of the national renewal fees payable in the states in
    which European patents are most frequently validated (TOP level)

Furthermore, based on this, two specific proposals are made – one where the Year 10 onwards level is based on current renewal fee levels for FOUR European countries (TOP 4 level) and one where the Year 10 onwards level is based on current renewal fee levels for FIVE European countries (TOP 5 level) but with a reduction for certain categories of patentees, namely SMEs, natural persons, non-profit organisations, universities and public research
organisations.

Based on these proposals, the cost of obtaining a UP would be more expensive than current filing strategies, if for example patentees usually validate in 3 or less states. And of course, given that it will not be possible to be selective as to EP countries which are maintained throughout the life of the patent, there is no option to scale down costs towards the end of the patent term.

We still need more pieces in the puzzle to get the full picture on whether a UP will save money in the long run.

Latest updates

IP Ingredients, Part 16: Food Supplement or Pharmaceutical? Understanding Trade Mark Distinctions

What is the difference between pharmaceuticals and food supplements?  This may not be a question raised all that often by the average person, but it can be very important when …

Read article

IP Ingredients: Summer case law review

As the summer reaches its peak and we reach for the ice-cream, it’s time to catch up on the legal battles in the food & drink sector that have been …

Read article
Event - 8th August 2024

pro-manchester Retail Lunch

HGF is proud to be sponsoring the pro-manchester Retail Lunch. The pro-manchester Retail Lunch will be held at the Manchester Marriott Victoria & Albert Hotel on Thursday, 8th August. The …

Event details

eControl System’s marketing and selling practices create unfair impression of a commercial connection with AGA

In July 2023, iconic British brand AGA Rangemaster Group Limited (“AGA”) filed a trade mark infringement and copyright complaint directed to eControl System’s[1] second-hand refurbished AGA cookers. The case vindicates …

Read article

Fuelling innovation – The IP Behind Sports Nutrition

The importance of innovation in sporting success With the Euros in full swing and the Olympics on the horizon, this summer elite athletes will be pushed to the limits of …

Read article

UPC issues two first instance decisions on infringement

Last week, just over one year since it became operational, the UPC handed down its first major decision in an infringement action. Here, the UPC met one of its primary …

Read article