< Back to latest news & events

UPC

Green Light from AG Bot for Unitary Patent in Europe

November 2014

The Opinion of Advocate General Bot, regarding Spain’s actions (CJEU cases C-146/13 and C-147/13) that the Regulations surrounding the creating of the European Unitary Patent should be annulled, has been given today. It is the Opinion of AG Bot that the CJEU should dismiss Spain’s actions.

Spain pleaded that the proposed language scheme would be discriminatory to persons whose mother tongue was not German, French or English. Furthermore, that aspects of EU law had been breached in the arranging of the Regulation on the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court.

Today’s press release states that unitary protection “brings real benefit” over the current European Patent Convention, where the effects of European patents are determined by national laws. Furthermore, even though the language arrangements that have been selected under the regime may curtail the use of some European languages, they “pursue a legitimate objective of reducing translation costs”. To limit the number of languages for the European Unitary Patent will reduce costs, and furthermore, acknowledges the linguistic realities of the patent sector (German, French and English are the most popular spoken languages from which patent application in the EU originate, as well as the languages of most published scientific papers).

In both cases brought by Spain, AG Bot proposed that CJEU should dismiss Spain’s actions.

The opinion of the Advocate General is not binding on the CJEU, and judgements will be given at a later stage. However, it is unusual for the Court not to follow the Opinion of the AG. The Opinion signifies a green light for unitary patent protection in Europe.

Latest updates

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

T 1847/22: Procedural considerations in appeal: Re-ordering of requests and the impact on admissibility

Background This case concerned EP 3 085 344 B1, which relates to a wound pad, a self-adhesive member comprising a wound pad. The patent was opposed by two opponents. During …

Read article

Regulation of NGT plants in Europe- Polish Presidency proposes an alternative solution to the Patent ban

In the latest development on the new proposed legislation for the regulation of NGT (gene-edited) plants in the EU, the Polish Presidency have proposed an amendment which removes the proposed …

Read article

T 0295/22: EPO Technical Board of Appeal relies on “bonus effect” case law to find Amgen’s patent to orally administered apremilast lacking in inventive step

This case concerned Amgen’s European patent no. 2962690 for apremilast, a drug sold under the brand name Otezla®, licensed for the treatment of e.g., psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.  The patent …

Read article
Event - 18th March 2025

Salzburg Seminar: Pitfalls in trade mark practice - What can be protected as a trade mark?

The registration of trade marks is a central component of trade mark protection – but which signs can actually be protected? In recent years, the national trade mark offices and …

Event details

Can the Chancellor’s so-called “Europe’s Silicon Valley” really replicate the innovative activity of its namesake?

The Chancellor of the UK, Rachel Reeves, recently unveiled plans to deliver an Oxford-Cambridge growth corridor that promises to boost the UK economy by up to £78 billion by 2035.  …

Read article

UPC’s CFI (Milan) extends deadline to file defence to infringement claim to align with parallel EPO appeal proceedings

Dainese S.p.A. v. Alpinestars S.p.A. & ors. UPC_CFI_472/2024 – Milan Local Division (Perrotti, Zana, Klein, Ashley) – 15 January 2025 The Milan Local Division granted a defendant’s request for an …

Read article