Mr Mrs Miss Ms Dr Other

Mr
Robin
van Stipriaan

Senior Trade Mark Attorney

Amsterdam Office

Trade marks

Telephone. +31(0) 20 809 5628
Email. rstipriaan@hgf.com

Experience

Robin graduated in 2006 with a law degree from the University of Amsterdam and subsequently joined Novagraaf as an IP assistant consultant. In 2009 Robin passed the exam of the Benelux Trademark and Design Association and became a qualified Benelux and EU Trademark Attorney. Robin serviced appealing clients in amongst others the fashion, food, semiconductor, automotive, cycling, conference and horticultural industry.

Robin considers himself to be a good fun and friendly person with a good sense of humour. He’s a flexible and highly experienced senior trade mark attorney. Robin likes the legal aspects of the job, but also enjoys working on the commercial and social aspects (e.g. BD, acquisition and client visits). He’s reliable, self-motivated, commercially focused, dedicated, pragmatic and has great self-awareness (in order to best service his clients, he knows when to delegate a potential lawsuit to an IP law firm). Furthermore, he’s customer friendly, customer oriented, helpful, straightforward, polite and has great listening, communication and time management skills.

Robin gained a lot of experience with strategic and cost-efficient management of rapidly growing, international IP portfolio's. Furthermore, he’s frequently been involved with trade mark clearance projects, due diligence & re-branding projects. Robin joined HGF in June 2023.

Robin is a member of the Benelux Association of Trademark and Design Law (BMM).

Qualifications

Trade Mark Attorney

Benelux
Europe
EU


LAW DEGREE

University of Amsterdam

POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA OR CERTIFICATE

Certified BMM Attorney

Publications

Bite-sized MBA Course

View publication online

Related News

PRESS RELEASE – HGF strengthens European presence with three new Partners in France and Germany

HGF is pleased to announce the arrival of three new partners, further strengthening its European presence. Two partners will be joining the firm’s fast-growing French practice, and one will join …

Read article

G1/23: The Enlarged Board of Appeal shift EPO practice towards an “on-sale” bar.

Last week, the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) issued its Decision that both a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application, …

Read article

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

Avoiding Legal Pitfalls: The Notting Hill Bag Company's Costly Mistake

[2025] EWHC 1793 (IPEC) – Natasha Courtenay-Smith and Notting Hill Bag Company Limited v The Notting Hill Shopping Bag Company Limited, Nangialai Takanai, The Notting Hill Shopper Bag Ltd, Ehsanullah …

Read article
Event - 12th September 2025

Wolters Kluwer Breakfast Panel on AI & IP at AIPPI

Sofie McPherson, Patent Director at HGF, will be moderating a special breakfast panel session hosted by Wolters Kluwer at the AIPPI World Congress in Yokohama on 15 September 2025. Session …

Event details

T1465/23 – No Narrowing by Description—EPO Board Terminates Inventive Step Analysis for Arbitrary Modifications Citing G1/24 and G1/19

“The potential patentability of a specific narrow embodiment…cannot render a claim allowable which, due to its breadth, encompasses a multitude of other, non-inventive embodiments” – r. 3.5. Background EP3113515 was …

Read article

Wrestling with G1/24 – How should the claims be interpreted in view of the description?

In G1/24, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) codified how claims should be interpreted for assessing patentability: in consultation with the description. However, the decision was light on how, in …

Read article

Let's talk

If you would like to discuss how HGF could help you, contact one of our IP specialists.