< Back to latest news & events

Retail Scanner

When is a genuine product no longer ‘genuine’?

September 2018

Legitimate spare part or counterfeit? Rolex has issued proceedings in the U.S against Vintage Watchmaker LLC for offering “non-Rolex approved” replacement parts. Rolex argue that these turn an otherwise legitimate Rolex watch into a counterfeit good.

This raises the question of whether a genuine good can become a counterfeit product by virtue of replacement parts not supplied or authorised by the original manufacturer.

The World Intellectual Property Organisation defines counterfeit goods as “any goods bearing, without authorisation, a trade mark identical to the trade mark validly registered in respect of such goods, or which cannot be distinguished in essential aspects, thereby infringing the rights of the owner.” In this case the traditional definition of counterfeit does not necessarily appear to be present. The watch itself is legitimately bearing the Rolex mark, but do “non-Rolex” spare parts make it counterfeit?

The applicable law concerns an overlap between designs and trade marks. In the UK and EU, the case Acacia (EU:C:2017:992) determined that the design of goods can be copied to create spare parts, provided for repair and to restore original appearance. This then overlaps with trade mark law, as the promotion of  spare parts as compatible with the original manufacturer requires referring to the brand, which raises the possibility of trade mark infringement. Here, Vintage Watchmaker arguably must use the “Rolex” mark to enable consumers to understand that the parts such as a replacement dial or strap can be used for their luxury watch. However, would the use of non-branded spare parts change the physical condition of the traded goods and thus be considered to be trade mark infringement.

In an ever-expanding consumerist society, counterfeit is becoming ever more prevalent, challenging and nuanced to retailers and brand owners. Consumers want a good deal in the marketplace which inevitably raises the possibility of alternative less expensive options. It will be interesting to see whether Rolex succeed in the litigation and the inevitable issue for retailers is how to make products which are hard to reproduce for the purposes of spare parts without infringing intellectual property rights such as designs, trademarks and even patents.

Latest updates

Event - 3rd-4th March 2023

LSPN North America Spring 2023

HGF are gold sponsors of the LSPN North America Spring 2023 in Boston on the 3 – 4th of May. Brought to you by Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review, this …

Event details
Event - 16th March 2023

Pro-Manchester Retail Lunch 2023

HGF is sponsoring the Pro – Manchester Retail Lunch 2023 on the 27th of April at The Bridgewater Hall in Manchester. Retailers have continued to face numerous challenges over the …

Event details

Fashionably IP Podcast Series 2 – exploring hot topics in the world of fashion and intellectual property

We are delighted to launch series 2 of our Fashionably IP Podcast where we will be looking at important hot topics in the world of fashion and intellectual property. In …

Read article
Event - 28th-29th March 2023

German Biotechnology days 2023

HGF Partner Dr Markus Zoller is attending and speaking at the German Biotechnology days 2023 on the 28th – 29th of March. German Biotechnology days is the go to event …

Event details
Event - 27th April 2023

Azets Yorkshire Food & Drink Business Awards 2023

HGF is sponsoring the Azets Yorkshire Food & Drink Business Awards 2023 on the 27th of April. The Awards aim to celebrate those businesses that have continued to excel and …

Event details
Event - 13th June 2023

Luxury Law Awards 2023

HGF is sponsoring the ‘IP Counsel of the Year’ award at the Luxury Law Awards on the 13th June in London. The Luxury Law Awards recognise the skills needed to …

Event details