< Back to latest news & events

News

The Microbiome Times: ELIGO v SNIPR: a reflection on IP strategies in a competitive environment

February 2022

HGF Partner and Patent Attorney Craig Thomson and Patent Director Dr Jennifer Bailey write an article for The Microbiome Times on ELIGO v SNIPR: a reflection on IP strategies in a competitive environment.

Introduction

In November 2021, US “Interference” proceedings resulted in cancellation of five US patents owned by SNIPR TECHNOLOGIES. It was concluded that the technology claimed in those patents was invented earlier by The Rockefeller University. The University have their own earlier patent filing focused on that technology, which is licenced to ELIGO BIOSCIENCE. The decision is under Appeal.

Perhaps the most commercially relevant lessons to be learned from these proceedings relate to IP strategy creation in a developing and competitive market. Both ELIGO and SNIPR are well known developers of microbiome therapeutics that harness the gene editing specificity of CRISPR. They are clearly competitors and have no doubt been building an IP portfolio and strategy with this in mind.

General IP Strategy aims

IP strategies designed to enable an innovator to dominate a developing and competitive field should have the long-term aim of securing IP rights that map onto the commercial product (providing a monopoly of sales for that product). In the short-term, the strategy should provide tools to raise investment (essentially by suggesting achievability of the long-term aim).

But, how can one build the appropriate strategy if one cannot yet know the specifics of the product that will ultimately go to market?

Read the full article here.

Latest updates

Agritech Thymes: Arusha Protocol Enters into Force

Since being introduced in July 2015, the Arusha protocol for the protection of novel plant varieties in Africa has finally entered into force on the 24th November 2024, after ratification …

Read article

HGF office closures in December 2024 and January 2025

Please note that our offices will be closed for business in accordance with national holidays on the following dates.  Please plan accordingly and provide us with your instructions in advance …

Read article

Central Division takes pragmatic approach to late-filed submissions and revokes VMR’s patent for lack of inventive step

In Njoy v VMR (UPC_CFI_308/2023), the Paris Central Division confirmed that the “front loaded” provisions of the UPC should be interpreted in line with the principles of proportionality and procedural …

Read article

Celebrating Success – Director Promotions

We are proud to announce that 7 of our team have been promoted to director effective from 1 December 2024! These promotions recognise the outstanding contributions demonstrated by these individuals, who …

Read article

G2/24: A new referral to the Enlarged Board seeks to clarify whether a third party who intervened during appeal proceedings can acquire full appellant status

In the referring decision, T1286/23, the Board of Appeal referred the following questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal: After the withdrawal of all appeals, may the proceedings be continued …

Read article

UPC first FRAND judgment results in injunction against OPPO

Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd & anor UPC_CFI_210/2023 – Mannheim Local Division (Tochtermann, Böttcher, Brinkman & Loibner) – 22 November 2024. The UPC issued its …

Read article