< Back to latest news & events

News

Can intellectual property and foreign investment save struggling European eVTOL companies?

February 2025

With the ongoing funding difficulties in the European eVTOL sector, we look at the role that intellectual property is likely to play in the prospects for the survival of Lilium and Volocopter.

As reported by Forbes and others recently, major European eVTOL companies have been struggling to secure funding, despite having reached the stage of flight trials. Two companies making the headlines are the German manufacturers Lilium and Volocopter. Lilium appears likely to be rescued from insolvency, with investment planned from the Mobile Uplift Corporation consortium. Volocopter meanwhile continues to look for investment having filed for insolvency in December 2024.

In common with many, the intellectual property (IP) assets of these companies likely represent the majority of their respective values. Especially as R&D-heavy businesses, the principal value will be found in some combination of technology, designs, data, knowledge and brand repute. Tangible assets such as property, materials, tooling, and stock are typically far less significant. Consequently, of great importance for investors will be whether or not the intangible IP is well protected with IP rights, such as patents and trademarks. These rights guard against theft of the IP.

Encouragingly, both Lilium and Volocopter have invested heavily in IP rights. This does not, of course, in and of itself, guarantee that the companies are valuable. The strength of the case that can be made for the technical approach that each has taken, as well as the future shape and viability of the eVTOL sector itself are also critical. Nonetheless, both Lilium and Volocopter can claim to have sought to protect their most valuable assets. Further and consequently, each will likely hold many important and unique technological monopolies that they (or any successor in title) can exploit alone or licence. This will give them a better chance in the battle to survive and thrive.

Upon first inspection, the patent and patent application portfolios of both Lilium and Volocopter appear valuable and have interesting differences in terms of areas of principal technical interest.

Portfolios at a glance:

Lilium

Active patent families with at least one publication: ≈ 92.

Average age of portfolio: Low (many years to run on average).

Geographical diversity of portfolio: Focused in Europe and the US.

Technical focus areas: Propulsion systems; electrical system and battery technology; airframe; and flight control and navigation systems.

Volocopter

Active patent families with at least one publication: ≈ 74.

Average age of portfolio: Low (many years to run on average).

Geographical diversity of portfolio: Focused in the US, China and Europe.

Technical focus areas: Flight control and navigation systems and airframe.

The Lilium portfolio appears somewhat larger and more technically diverse in its focus. Its portfolio may therefore offer a broader range of protection. The Volocopter portfolio meanwhile has a more even geographical split, including a significant number of Chinese applications. This may offer a little more encouragement to Chinese based investors such as Geely, who are rumoured to be interested.

In both cases, there is a time-based wrinkle. Many applications/patents are approaching renewal dates and whilst the payment of renewal fees can be extended for a period, rights can eventually be lost. Further, a peculiarity of German patent law is a suite of additional benefits given to inventors over their employers. In the event of insolvency, this includes circumstances in which inventors are given a right of refusal on purchasing the patents/applications to their inventions. There are therefore IP associated risks in waiting too long.

From the perspective of an investor, the IP portfolios of these companies could be very attractive. Such portfolios may for instance be complementary to an existing portfolio of  an investing entity (e.g. consolidating protection in an important area of technical strength, or acquiring protection in an existing area of technical weakness). Alternatively, such IP portfolios could be seen as security for a new entrant or a short-cut to a technologically developed and protected position.

If as Forbes suggests, the issue for European eVTOL companies is principally one of capital being more difficult to raise in Europe, then investment and/or takeovers from further afield may well be imminent.


This article was prepared by Patent Director John Hawtree and Partner & Patent Attorney Bernhard Ganahl.

Latest updates

HGF Ranked #1 in the UK for Trade Mark Portfolios in the 2025 Trade Mark Filing Trends Report by Clarivate.

HGF has achieved the #1 ranking for the UK for trade mark portfolios in the newly released 2025 Trade mark Filing Trends report by Clarivate, recognising the firm as a …

Read article

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

IP Ingredients: Summer Case Law Review 2025

As the British summer swings once again between sunburn and showers, it’s a great time to take stock of what the first half of the year has delivered by way …

Read article

Celebrating exam success at HGF!

We are once again delighted to share that our colleagues have achieved success in their recent exams! Their dedication, perseverance, and commitment to professional development have paid off, and we …

Read article

Is the Supreme Court denial in Thatcher’s case a fatal blow against lookalikes?

The dispute between Thatcher’s Cider Company and Aldi Stores Limited has been long running and has sparked legal controversy along the way. On 4th June 2025 the Supreme denied Aldi …

Read article

HGF ranked among Europe’s top patent firms in IP STARS Patent Rankings 2025

HGF has once again made a bold mark in the latest Managing IP Stars 2025 firm rankings, with top-tier recognition across multiple jurisdictions for our patent expertise. This year’s results …

Read article

The Enlarged Board of Appeal has today issued its decision in seminal case G1/24

G1/24, described as one of the most important cases in decades, relates to how claims of patents are to be interpreted by the Boards of Appeal and, by extension, all …

Read article