< Back to latest news & events

News

EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G4/19 – a European patent application can be refused by reason of the prohibition on double patenting

June 2021

The European Patent Office today confirmed in Decision G4/19 of the Enlarged board of Appeal that a European patent application can be refused for ‘double patenting’.  Such a refusal can be made even absent the European Patent Convention having an explicit double patenting provision.

The claiming of the same subject matter in two applications having the same filing or priority date to the same Applicant is referred to as double patenting.  The European Patent Convention does not contain an explicit prohibition against this practice. However, previous decisions against double patenting have relied upon a reference to general principles of patent law in EPC Contracting States embodied in Article 125 EPC.  For example, Section 18(5) of the UK Patents Act provides such an explicit double patenting provision.  It was argued that the double patenting provision embodied in Article 125 EPC only prevented double patenting in the case of applications filed on the same day or between a divisional application and its parent.

The Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed that Article 125 EPC compelled the EPO to refuse applications for double patenting by taking into account national law of Contracting States.  Furthermore, the Enlarged Board found that double patenting is also prohibited in the case of internal priority i.e. where two applications benefit from the same priority and claim the same subject matter.

It is worth pointing out that the EPO only construes the probation on double patenting narrowly in order to prevent two patents claiming the same identical subject matter.  Therefore, where differences exist between the claims, the double patenting prohibition should not apply.

This article was prepared by HGF Partner Chris Benson. If you would like further advice on this or any other matter, please contact Chris. Alternatively, you can contact your usual HGF representative or visit our Contact page to get in touch with your nearest HGF office.

Latest updates

Often Copied, Never Equaled: When Do Everyday Items Become Subject of Copyright?

The  borderline between ‘pure’ works of art and mere utilitarian objects” –  Can iconic, yet everyday products be protected under copyright? The above question was posed by Advocate General in …

Read article

T 0883/23: Dosage claims and their entitlement to priority when only the clinical trial protocol was disclosed in the priority application

In a recently issued decision by the EPO’s Board of Appeal (BoA), the BoA held that claims directed to a combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) at particular doses were …

Read article

The end of the Brexit overhang for trade marks: review, refile and revoke.

On the 31st December 2025, five years will have passed since the end of the Brexit transitional period on 31st December 2020. Why is this relevant? For UK cloned trade …

Read article
Event - 14th January 2026

Seminar on The aftermath of G1/24 - has anything changed?

HGF is hosting a The aftermath of G1/24 – has anything changed? Which will be followed by networking, apero, and snacks. The Seminar will be held on Wednesday, 14th January …

Event details

Personal names as 'brands' in the world of fashion

Episode 1 Personal names as ‘brands’ in the world of fashion    

Read article

Colour in fashion and the difficulties of protecting it

Episode 2 Colour in fashion and the difficulties of protecting it  

Read article

Trade marks which are fashion products, and fashion products which are trade marks

Episode 3 Trade marks which are fashion products, and fashion products which are trade marks

Read article

Zombie Fashion Brands

Episode 4 Zombie Fashion Brands  

Read article