< Back to latest news & events

UPC

UPC – Preparatory Committee Proposes Court Fees

May 2015

Over 2 years after the Agreement on the Unitary Patent Court was signed, the Preparatory Committee has published proposed Court fees and launched a public consultation on the fee structure for the Court.

The consultation document comprises of two options revising the Rules of Procedure, including a table of fees, a scale of ceilings for recoverable costs and an Explanatory Note.

The Committee have said that “The fee structure for the Unified Patent Court will comprise fixed fees and, for certain actions, an additional value based fee. The fee levels proposed are the lowest that will enable eventual sustainability of the Court”. Two alternatives have been set out.

Given that the Unitary Patent and UPC have been championed by the European Parliament to “cut costs for small firms and tailored the regime to their needs…” it may be surprising that both the proposed alternatives include a minimum fixed fee of €11, 000 to bring an infringement action before the UPC. Furthermore, for claims with a value greater than €500,000, a value-based fee will also be payable (increasing with value of the action). Counter claims for revocation have the same fixed fee, and revocations, higher still at €20,000. Ceiling levels for recoverable costs are also proposed, starting at €50,000 for a €250, 000 action.

There are options for seeking reductions; in one alterative, reimbursements may be available if the action is settled or withdrawn and in the other alternative, SMEs, micro entities and the like, may apply for an exemption (this will only apply to the value based fees).

More welcome news will be the proposal that an opt-out fee, to remove a European patent from the jurisdiction of the UPC, should be set at €80, and this will be applicable to each patent, and not each designation. Comments (electronically to the [email protected] before midnight on the 31 July) are welcomed on any aspect of the proposal and will be considered by the Preparatory Committee and its appropriate Working Groups prior to publication of an agreed fee structure.

Latest updates

HGF Ranked #1 in the UK for Trade Mark Portfolios in the 2025 Trade Mark Filing Trends Report by Clarivate.

HGF has achieved the #1 ranking for the UK for trade mark portfolios in the newly released 2025 Trade mark Filing Trends report by Clarivate, recognising the firm as a …

Read article

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

IP Ingredients: Summer Case Law Review 2025

As the British summer swings once again between sunburn and showers, it’s a great time to take stock of what the first half of the year has delivered by way …

Read article

Celebrating exam success at HGF!

We are once again delighted to share that our colleagues have achieved success in their recent exams! Their dedication, perseverance, and commitment to professional development have paid off, and we …

Read article

Is the Supreme Court denial in Thatcher’s case a fatal blow against lookalikes?

The dispute between Thatcher’s Cider Company and Aldi Stores Limited has been long running and has sparked legal controversy along the way. On 4th June 2025 the Supreme denied Aldi …

Read article

HGF ranked among Europe’s top patent firms in IP STARS Patent Rankings 2025

HGF has once again made a bold mark in the latest Managing IP Stars 2025 firm rankings, with top-tier recognition across multiple jurisdictions for our patent expertise. This year’s results …

Read article

The Enlarged Board of Appeal has today issued its decision in seminal case G1/24

G1/24, described as one of the most important cases in decades, relates to how claims of patents are to be interpreted by the Boards of Appeal and, by extension, all …

Read article