< Back to latest news & events

News

Fast track or slow lane: Patent strategy or IP cost control?

April 2020

The patent application procedure is notoriously slow and driven by fixed deadlines. We are often asked how to speed up the process and also how to slow down the procedure when big costs approach such as validation of a granted European patent.

The issue becomes even more pressing when you have patent applications running simultaneously in Europe and the United States. Your patent attorney can help you align the patent application procedure with your commercial milestones.

Why slow down?

You might ask why one would want to slow down the procedure as it already typically takes several years for a patent to be granted. However, keeping an application pending can give a commercial advantage in that it creates uncertainty for competitors who cannot be sure what scope of monopoly might be granted to you. Your options are kept open, for example, to amend the claims later or to file a divisional application for subject matter that can be separated from the main invention. Bear in mind, though, that the European Patent Office charges annual renewal fees on pending patent applications, the cost of which should be factored into your approach. Slowing the process can be achieved by using the maximum time permitted to respond to the examiner’s objections, requesting extensions of time where possible and, at the EPO using the “further processing” procedure whereby an additional 2-3 months of time can be gained for a fee of EUR265.

Speeding up process

Speeding up the patent application procedure can be useful to get an earlier indication of patentability that can be used for early stage investment rounds. For technology that is likely to be contentious, you may wish to get through the EPO’s opposition period (whereby anyone can oppose the grant of a European patent within nine months of its grant) as quickly as possible before the product is launched. The UK’s Patent Box tax regime requires a granted patent for you to participate.

European patent applications can be accelerated using the PACE procedure whereby a simple form (with no fee) is filed. No reason needs to be given for wanting accelerated handling. A PACE request can be filed once in each of the search and examination phases and the EPO undertakes to provide the next communication within 6 or 3 months respectively. You have to keep your side of the bargain though – if you subsequently request an extension, or pay renewal fees late, your PACE request will be cancelled.

Acceleration program examples
  • The UK Intellectual Property Office has a Green Channel for accelerated handling of patent applications where the applicant can explain why the technology is environmentally friendly. This can be invoked by a written request and it is possible to view other applications in the Green Channel (and the reasons given by their applicants) on the UKIPO website.
  • The United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) has a Track One Program where applications can be accelerated for a fee of $4000 ($2000 for a small entity). This can result in an examination report in only a couple of months and potentially the grant of the US patent in substantially less than a year from filing.
  • There are other acceleration programs at the USPTO with no fee including acceleration for age or health (e.g. where one inventor is of age 65 or over) and Patents4Patients for inventions relating to cancer immunotherapy in Phase II or Phase III (FDA) trial.
The Patent Prosecution Highway program

The Patent Prosecution Highway program is available at all of the UKIPO, EPO and USPTO. This is a program whereby, if you have patent claims allowed in one jurisdiction, that work product can be used to accelerate handling of the same patent claims in another jurisdiction. There are some limitations as to which countries participate and, potentially, it may be undesirable to limit your patent claims in one jurisdiction to claims granted in another which has different patentability requirements. Either way, your patent attorney will be able to advise on your particular case.

Summary

In all cases, it can be very helpful for your patent attorney to make use of informal interviews with the patent examiner to make progress with the patent application and test out potential claim amendments before making a formal submission.

Keep your patent attorney informed of your key business milestones, especially if the situation changes and we can speed up or slow down the application process to best align with your needs.

This article was prepared by HGF Partner Vanessa Stainthorpe and Dr Prashant Girinitah and Dr Lou Lieto from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.  If you would like further advice on this or any other matter, please contact Vanessa.  Alternatively, you can contact your usual HGF representative or visit our Contact page to get in touch with your nearest HGF office.

Latest updates

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

HGF ranked highly recommended in the WIPR Trade Mark Rankings 2025

HGF has been recognised as a leading firm in the recently published World IP Review (WIPR) Trade Mark Rankings 2025. This achievement highlights our continued commitment to excellence in trade …

Read article

T1977/22: Can claims defined by open-ended ranges ever be sufficiently disclosed?

The EPO’s Board of Appeal’s decision in T1977/22 provides an interesting review of the case law concerning the compatibility of whole range sufficiency and claims defined as a result to …

Read article

The draft of The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025 reveals practical details on how to obtain a Precision Bred Organism status

In a recent blog post we discussed the Precision Breeding Regulatory Framework developed by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). Further details on the application process for Precision Bred Organism confirmation …

Read article

A £2.1M Lesson: The Power of Confidential Information

A recent High Court ruling1 serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respecting confidential business information. Hambro Perks, was found guilty of breaching confidentiality and ordered to pay …

Read article
Event - 6th March 2025

IQPC Global IP Exchange Europe 2025

HGF is sponsoring the IQPC Global IP Exchange Europe, which will be held on the 11th-12th March 2025 in Meliá, Berlin. Head of Electronics, Chris Benson, will be chairing the …

Event details

IP Ingredients: Pouring Over the Verdict: What Thatchers v Aldi Means for Food & Drink Brands

Readers of our IP Ingredients blog may recall that we covered something of this case last summer in our post IP Ingredients: Summer case law review. The dispute between Thatchers …

Read article