< Back to latest news & events

News

A new dawn for European patents and patent litigation – 1 June 2023

June 2023

Just as the UPC’s sunrise phase has ended, a new dawn is breaking for European patents and patent litigation.  After many years of anticipation, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and a new “European patent with unitary effect” or “unitary patent” (UP) are now a reality.

 

The primary aim of the UPC is to provide a harmonised system of patent litigation, within a single set of proceedings, within the participating EU member states.  At present there are 17 EU MS who have ratified the UPC Agreement and will participate in the UP.  This is expected to rise to at least 18 EU MS in 2024 if Ireland’s UPC referendum is approved and could rise to 24 EU MS, or even to all EU MS should Spain, Poland and Croatia decide to sign up to the UPC Agreement.

 

From today, the UPC has exclusive jurisdiction over all European patents that have not been opted-out of its jurisdiction.  Patentees will be able to enforce their EP bundle or UP in a single action before the UPC and third-party challengers will be able to bring claims and counterclaims for revocation.  The UPC can also order provisional measures, including preliminary injunctions and seizure of evidence of infringement (saisie).  During a 7 year transitional phase, where EPs have not been opted-out both the UPC and the national patent courts can hear matters, which allows for a degree of forum shopping between the courts, as well as a possible resurgence of torpedo litigations.

 

Our expectation is that the first UPs will be granted on 7 June 2023 and create a unitary patent right across all 17 EU MS that have ratified the UPC Agreement currently (including Germany, France, Italy and The Netherlands).  These UPs will benefit from a single renewal fee, payable to the EPO that has been set to approximately the costs of validating an EP in 4 EU MS, which for some patentees will represent a significant saving.  The renewal fee must be paid in full each year and cannot be reduced by “dropping” coverage of certain UPC countries.  As with all EPs, the UP can be opposed as part of the EPO’s central opposition procedures (alongside any other EP nationals) within 9 months of grant.  The UP can only be enforced or centrally revoked in litigation before the UPC.

 

During the three-months leading up to the launch of the UPC, approximately 460,000 European patents and patent applications have been opted-out.  Provided no litigation has been launched before the UPC, applications to opt-out can be filed for at least the next 7 years.  We expect that many patentees will continue to file applications to opt-out before grant of the EP while watching how the UPC develops.  The opt-out will last for the lifetime of the EP unless it is withdrawn.  An application to withdraw the opt-out can be filed at any time during the lifetime of the EP unless there has been any national litigation (pending or concluded).

 

With a team of specialist European patent litigators, oppositions specialists and patent attorney teams who bring together an extensive depth of legal and technical knowledge, HGF is ideally placed to advise on the impact of the UPC on patent litigation, prosecution and licensing strategy.  For further information please contact [email protected] or speak to your usual HGF attorney.

 

 

Latest updates

Agritech Thymes: Arusha Protocol Enters into Force

Since being introduced in July 2015, the Arusha protocol for the protection of novel plant varieties in Africa has finally entered into force on the 24th November 2024, after ratification …

Read article

HGF office closures in December 2024 and January 2025

Please note that our offices will be closed for business in accordance with national holidays on the following dates.  Please plan accordingly and provide us with your instructions in advance …

Read article

Central Division takes pragmatic approach to late-filed submissions and revokes VMR’s patent for lack of inventive step

In Njoy v VMR (UPC_CFI_308/2023), the Paris Central Division confirmed that the “front loaded” provisions of the UPC should be interpreted in line with the principles of proportionality and procedural …

Read article

Celebrating Success – Director Promotions

We are proud to announce that 7 of our team have been promoted to director effective from 1 December 2024! These promotions recognise the outstanding contributions demonstrated by these individuals, who …

Read article

G2/24: A new referral to the Enlarged Board seeks to clarify whether a third party who intervened during appeal proceedings can acquire full appellant status

In the referring decision, T1286/23, the Board of Appeal referred the following questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal: After the withdrawal of all appeals, may the proceedings be continued …

Read article

UPC first FRAND judgment results in injunction against OPPO

Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd & anor UPC_CFI_210/2023 – Mannheim Local Division (Tochtermann, Böttcher, Brinkman & Loibner) – 22 November 2024. The UPC issued its …

Read article