{"id":8851,"date":"2020-07-04T14:35:30","date_gmt":"2020-07-04T13:35:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/?p=8851"},"modified":"2026-02-02T14:56:06","modified_gmt":"2026-02-02T14:56:06","slug":"planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/","title":{"rendered":"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p__large\">High Court judgement regarding mobile phone app icons. An interesting\u00a0High Court judgment\u00a0(England and Wales) has been handed down regarding infringement and passing off in relation to a mobile phone app.<\/p>\n<h5>Background<\/h5>\n<p>PlanetArt LLC [the Claimant] had produced and marketed a \u2018Free Prints\u2019 mobile phone app aimed at providing a limited number of free copies of user\u2019s images each month with the customer paying for delivery. The app was very successful with approximately 11.5 million downloads by 2019.<\/p>\n<p>Photobox Limited are an established provider of photo quality prints on a \u2018paid for\u2019 basis. They launched an app allowing customers to order a limited number of prints for free under the \u2018Photobox Free Prints\u2019 app in April 2019.<\/p>\n<p>PlanetArt LLC launched infringement proceedings based on the use of Photobox\u2019s Free Prints Icons [shown below], use of \u2018Photobox Free Prints\u2019 in various app stores, as well as a passing off claim.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Claimant\u2019s mark\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-8852\" src=\"https:\/\/img.hgf.com\/spio\/ret_img,q_cdnize,to_auto,s_webp:avif\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Claimants-mark.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"174\" height=\"182\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Defendant\u2019s marks<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The mark was primarily used as follows:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-8860\" src=\"https:\/\/img.hgf.com\/spio\/ret_img,q_cdnize,to_auto,s_webp:avif\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Defendants-marks.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"182\" height=\"194\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Defendant also used a \u2018Christmassy\u2019 version of the mark during the festive period which was included in the claim:<\/p>\n<p>PlanetArt initially used a claim of passing off to seek an interim injunction against continued use of the Photobox app. The request for an injunction ultimately failed, largely because Photobox had taken some limited action to cease further commercialisation of the app with undertakings to PlanetArt. It seems this act of goodwill worked in Photobox\u2019s favour and the injunction request was not granted.<\/p>\n<p>Subsequently, PlanetArt began formal infringement proceedings against Photobox claiming likelihood of confusion (s.10(2)) TMA, detriment to distinctive character\/unfair advantage (s.10(3)) TMA and passing off.<\/p>\n<h5>Likelihood of Confusion<\/h5>\n<p>The case was heard by Mr. Daniel Alexander QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge at the High Court of England and Wales. The Deputy Judge found that the icons were similar from the perspective of the average consumer, identifying that there were strong aural and visual similarities in the marks, as well as some conceptual similarities. The Deputy Judge found that the icons would likely be viewed as a brand in the minds of the average consumer. Taking this into account, along with the similarities in the appearance of the icons (the colour combination and choice of white line drawings within them), a likelihood of confusion was established. PlanetArt also established evidence of reputation which supported this finding. The \u2018FREE PRINTS\u2019 part of the mark was seen an descriptive and was not capable of giving rise to significant confusion on the part of the average consumer.<\/p>\n<h5>Detriment to distinctive character\/unfair advantage<\/h5>\n<p>Having established the reputation of PlanetArt\u2019s icon mark, the Deputy Judge found it apparent that the average consumer would establish a link between the icon mark and that of Photobox. However, the Deputy Judge found that the damage to the repute of PlanetArt\u2019s mark through the use of Photobox\u2019s mark would be marginal. The Deputy Judge found that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks which would lead to a detriment to the distinctive character of PlanetArt\u2019s marks and lead to an impairment of their reputation. Photobox was found to have infringed. However, it is important to note that infringement was found in relation to PlanetArt\u2019s icon marks, but not in relation to the \u2018FREE PRINTS\u2019 element\u00a0of the marks.<\/p>\n<h5>Passing off<\/h5>\n<p>In order to successfully claim passing off, three criteria must be established: there must be\u00a0<strong>goodwill<\/strong>\u00a0in the mark, there must be\u00a0<strong>misrepresentation<\/strong>\u00a0of that mark\/goodwill, and the misrepresentation must be seen to have caused\u00a0<strong>damage<\/strong>\u00a0to the goodwill in the mark. The Deputy Judge held that some goodwill was present in PlanetArt\u2019s mark by way of the distinctive appearance of the icon, but this was limited. When it came to the assessment of misrepresentation, since there was also no evidence of actual confusion between the marks when the apps were simultaneously available during April to November 2019, no misrepresentation was found. Without this, there could be no damage caused and no passing off could have occurred.<\/p>\n<h5>Conclusion<\/h5>\n<p>This partial success for PlanetArt highlights the importance of searching visual components of app icons to ensure that they would not be seen as infringing those of existing icons being used by third parties. It also emphasises the limited value of including descriptive elements in trade marks as such elements may not be enforceable, as was the case with the \u2018FREE PRINTS\u2019 element in the claimant\u2019s mark in this case.<\/p>\n<p>It is interesting that the Deputy Judge chose to highlight the general behaviour of Photobox in their choice of branding by describing it as an \u201c<em>antisocial non-distancing of the Defendants\u2019 identity from that of the Claimants<\/em>\u201d. Perhaps this indicates an increasing willingness on the part of the Courts to identify when Defendants are possibly taking unfair advantage in a commercial context, as well as in a legal context.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-author-name p__medium\">By\u00a0James Appleyard &#8211; James is a part-qualified Trade Mark Attorney based in HGF&#8217;s London Office. Prior to joining HGF James worked for a number of private practice firms as a paralegal assisting attorneys with a broad range of trade mark matters, including filing and prosecution of trade mark applications and a range of contentious matters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court judgement regarding mobile phone app icons. An interesting\u00a0High Court judgment\u00a0(England and Wales) has been handed down regarding infringement and passing off in relation to a mobile phone app. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":315,"featured_media":9004111222083197,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[519,518],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-artikel","category-wissens-hub","sector-einzelhandelsbranche"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.3 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited - HGF<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court judgement regarding mobile phone app icons. An interesting\u00a0High Court judgment\u00a0(England and Wales) has been handed down regarding infringement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"HGF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-04T13:35:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-02T14:56:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@behrooz@tall.agency\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@hgf_ip\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Verfasst von\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e6343663c5ee3e1ccea20cd220f97f30\"},\"headline\":\"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-04T13:35:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-02T14:56:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":875,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Artikel\",\"Wissens Hub\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de-DE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/\",\"name\":\"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited - HGF\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-04T13:35:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-02T14:56:06+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"de-DE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de-DE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/wissens-hub\\\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/\",\"name\":\"HGF\",\"description\":\"Intellectual Property Rights specialists\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de-DE\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"HGF\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de-DE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/hgf-logo-696x696-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/hgf-logo-696x696-1.png\",\"width\":696,\"height\":696,\"caption\":\"HGF\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/hgf_ip\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/hgf-limited-intellectual-property-specialists\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hgf.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e6343663c5ee3e1ccea20cd220f97f30\",\"name\":\"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de-DE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d9cf1622c8c99b4c7573ba733a04f6352d3557803ca19afd3e4aafc94d9bc0b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d9cf1622c8c99b4c7573ba733a04f6352d3557803ca19afd3e4aafc94d9bc0b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d9cf1622c8c99b4c7573ba733a04f6352d3557803ca19afd3e4aafc94d9bc0b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/behrooz@tall.agency\",\"Behrooz Saeed\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited - HGF","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited","og_description":"High Court judgement regarding mobile phone app icons. An interesting\u00a0High Court judgment\u00a0(England and Wales) has been handed down regarding infringement","og_url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/","og_site_name":"HGF","article_published_time":"2020-07-04T13:35:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-02T14:56:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@behrooz@tall.agency","twitter_site":"@hgf_ip","twitter_misc":{"Verfasst von":"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite","Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"5 Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/"},"author":{"name":"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/e6343663c5ee3e1ccea20cd220f97f30"},"headline":"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited","datePublished":"2020-07-04T13:35:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-02T14:56:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/"},"wordCount":875,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg","articleSection":["Artikel","Wissens Hub"],"inLanguage":"de-DE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/","url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/","name":"PlanetArt LLC vs Photobox Limited - HGF","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-04T13:35:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-02T14:56:06+00:00","inLanguage":"de-DE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de-DE","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wissens-hub\/planetart-llc-vs-photobox-limited\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/High-court-judgement-regarding-mobile-phone-app-icons-1.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/","name":"HGF","description":"Intellectual Property Rights specialists","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de-DE"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#organization","name":"HGF","url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de-DE","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/hgf-logo-696x696-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/hgf-logo-696x696-1.png","width":696,"height":696,"caption":"HGF"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/hgf_ip","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/hgf-limited-intellectual-property-specialists\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/e6343663c5ee3e1ccea20cd220f97f30","name":"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de-DE","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d9cf1622c8c99b4c7573ba733a04f6352d3557803ca19afd3e4aafc94d9bc0b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d9cf1622c8c99b4c7573ba733a04f6352d3557803ca19afd3e4aafc94d9bc0b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d9cf1622c8c99b4c7573ba733a04f6352d3557803ca19afd3e4aafc94d9bc0b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Akvil\u0117 Lukauskaite"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/behrooz@tall.agency","Behrooz Saeed"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/315"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8851"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8851\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9004111222083197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hgf.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}