< Back to latest news & events

Blogs

Blog Series: IP Ingredients, Part 2: Sippin’ Success with Trade Marks

December 2023

In the UK, trade marks and the food and drink industry have a long and rich heritage.  One of the most well known of these stories begins in 1876, when the Bass Pale Ale label incorporating the Red Triangle logo became the first trade mark to be registered under the UK’s new Trade Marks Registration Act 1875.

The story goes that a Bass Brewery employee queued overnight outside the Registrar’s office on New Year’s Eve 1985 to ensure that they were the first in line to register their trade mark when the act came into force on the 1st January 1876.  As a result, the Bass Red Triangle has become a historic case study showcasing the strategic foresight and value to be gained from early brand protection.

For Bass Brewery, the Red Triangle goes beyond being merely a logo – it’s a valuable asset, differentiating their products from their competitors and the bedrock for establishing a consistent and reliable brand identity.  The trade mark protection for the Red Triangle logo has therefore been pivotal to maintaining that identity for over a hundred years.

In the competitive landscape of the food and drink industry, trade marks play a vital role in safeguarding a brand’s identity.  They help to protect those distinctive elements that not only visually identify products or services but that also encapsulate a brand’s reputation, quality, and heritage.

A trade mark refers to a graphically representable sign, which, amongst other things, can be a brand name, logo, slogan or unique element of the packaging, that essentially serves as a visual cue. Trade marks protect the elements of a brand that distinguishes it’s product or services from those of another. Their primary function is to facilitate consumer recognition, fostering repeat purchases and thereby building a brand’s reputation for reliability and quality.

To be registrable as a trade mark the sign must be distinctive i.e. capable of functioning as a badge of origin, and cannot be descriptive of the relevant product or service.  However, within those criteria these brand elements can fall on a scale from the invented and fanciful marks, such as STARBUCKS®, named after the first mate on the Pequod in Moby-Dick, to the suggestive and allusive, such as AMBROSIA®, which refers back to the food or drink of the gods in Greek mythology.

Trade Mark protection grants exclusive rights to use the protected sign on the applied for goods or services, preventing others from causing confusion by using the same or a similar mark on those same or similar goods or services.

As seen in the Bass Brewery example, trade mark protection can differ from other types of registered intellectual property rights in terms of how long it can exist. A trade mark can be renewed, typically at 10 year intervals for an indefinite period. The only requirement is that it continue to be used in the same or a closely similar format and for the goods/services covered by the trade mark registration, otherwise, it could be cancelled by another party for non-use at any point after the first 5 years following registration.  This can be particularly valuable, especially where companies have invested significant amounts in not only creating a distinctive brand, but also in promoting it and building the trust and recognition in it with their consumers.

Crucially, trade mark protection serves both business and consumer interests. For example, seeing the Bass Red Triangle assures consumers of the product’s quality and adherence to Bass Brewery’s reputation. In a competitive market, trade marks act as shields, preventing competitors from capitalizing on a brand’s goodwill. Examples like COCA-COLA® and MCDONALD’S® also demonstrate how instant recognition, facilitated by both marketing and legal efforts, reinforces consumer expectations.

In the food and drink sector, trade marks transcend mere branding, becoming vital tools to distinguish products in a crowded market. The Bass Red Triangle transformed into a symbol of brewing excellence, contributing to Bass’s enduring reputation. Its success underscores the potency of consistent brand representation and protection, fostering consumer trust and loyalty.

The exclusivity granted by trade mark law preserves market share and brand integrity. Moreover, trade marks cultivate customer loyalty by associating positive experiences and quality with a brand. This trust is especially crucial in an industry where taste and quality are paramount.

In conclusion, trade marks are the bedrock of protecting brand identity in the dynamic food and drink sector. In an era of abundant consumer choices, trade mark protection is not just a legal necessity but a strategic imperative, ensuring a brand’s essence remains a beacon of reliability and trust. These silent guardians guide consumers through a crowded marketplace, preserving brand integrity and individuality, making our culinary experiences memorable. The Bass Red Triangle, with its rich history, exemplifies the lasting impact and importance of trade mark protection—not just a legal asset but a strategic business asset standing the test of time in the world of food and drink.

If you are considering trade mark protection for your brand and brand assets, below are some practical points to consider:

  1. Is your brand distinctive and capable of functioning as a trade mark.  If there are concerns around this or you are unsure, speak to a Trade Mark Attorney for further advice on your options.
  2.  Conduct some research to make sure that there isn’t already another brand in your area that is the same or similar to the one you are thinking of adopting.  Consider consulting with a Trade Mark Attorney for registered trade mark searches to ensure that your proposed name or logo for example, is free for your use and registration.
  3. Consider protecting other brand elements and not just the brand name, particularly if these are things that your consumers identify with you or your product.

For any questions relating to the above, or relating to any aspect of trade marks please contact the author, Tanya Waller at [email protected].


This article was prepared by Trade Mark Director Tanya Waller.

Latest updates

The EPO Board of Appeal comments on the scope of the morality exclusion from patentability

The recent decision, T1553/22 of the Board of Appeal required the Board to consider the scope of the exclusions from patentability under Article 53(a) EPC. The invention in this case …

Read article

HGF ranked highly recommended in the WIPR Trade Mark Rankings 2025

HGF has been recognised as a leading firm in the recently published World IP Review (WIPR) Trade Mark Rankings 2025. This achievement highlights our continued commitment to excellence in trade …

Read article

T1977/22: Can claims defined by open-ended ranges ever be sufficiently disclosed?

The EPO’s Board of Appeal’s decision in T1977/22 provides an interesting review of the case law concerning the compatibility of whole range sufficiency and claims defined as a result to …

Read article

The draft of The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025 reveals practical details on how to obtain a Precision Bred Organism status

In a recent blog post we discussed the Precision Breeding Regulatory Framework developed by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). Further details on the application process for Precision Bred Organism confirmation …

Read article

A £2.1M Lesson: The Power of Confidential Information

A recent High Court ruling1 serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respecting confidential business information. Hambro Perks, was found guilty of breaching confidentiality and ordered to pay …

Read article
Event - 6th March 2025

IQPC Global IP Exchange Europe 2025

HGF is sponsoring the IQPC Global IP Exchange Europe, which will be held on the 11th-12th March 2025 in Meliá, Berlin. Head of Electronics, Chris Benson, will be chairing the …

Event details

IP Ingredients: Pouring Over the Verdict: What Thatchers v Aldi Means for Food & Drink Brands

Readers of our IP Ingredients blog may recall that we covered something of this case last summer in our post IP Ingredients: Summer case law review. The dispute between Thatchers …

Read article